"Is hedging really a surefire way to win?", "What is permitted and what constitutes a violation of the terms and conditions?", and "Will hedging between different brokers go undetected?" — These three questions summarize the confusion surrounding hedging in overseas forex trading.To put it simply, hedging is not a surefire way to win. While profits and losses from price movements are offset, costs such as spreads, swaps, and margin remain and are not offset. Furthermore, very few brokers prohibit "hedging itself," and what is specifically prohibited by the terms and conditions is "hedging aimed at making profits without taking market risk."
This article will explain the mechanism of hedging, why it's called a "surefire winning strategy,"how the terms of service of 10 major companies handle "within the same account," "between multiple accounts," and "between different brokers" (with article numbers), how hedging is treated for the purpose of cashback and IB commissions, andeven examine the claim that "hedging is prohibited by the Financial Services Agency regulations" for domestic FX. The article will organize this information by referring to the original terms of service of each company and relevant legal articles. The goal is for readers to be able to decide for themselves whether they are allowed to do this with their own broker.
Conclusion | Key Points of Hedging in Overseas Forex Trading (as of September 2026)
- Hedging is not a guaranteed winning strategy. While the profit or loss from price movements is fixed, the spread is determined twice the moment the position is opened, and swaps are incurred on both sides.In all 23 data points compiled from the official swap values of 8 companies, the combined buy and sell swapswere negative (the median for USD/JPY was -approx. $10.56 per lot per day).It becomes more disadvantageous over time; it is a temporary measure to buy time.
- None of the 10 major brokers we surveyed prohibited hedging within the same account on MT4 or MT5(Axi's proprietary platform ATP officially states that it is "not permitted").Exnessformally defines "Hedged Positions" in its terms of service and even specifies how margin is calculated. However, the required margin for hedging varies by broker; some require 0%, others 50%, and some differ depending on the instrument and platform.
- The terms and conditions specifically prohibit not "hedging" but "trading aimed at risk-free profits." Eight out of ten companies mentioned hedging between multiple accounts, and four mentioned hedging between different brokers. The prohibited types of hedging include abuse of zero-cut and hedging for the purpose of obtaining bonuses or cashback (see the article for a list of the ten companies with their clause numbers).
- There is no way to avoid detection. Within the same broker, detection is possible solely through transaction history, and even between different brokers, the terms and conditions clearly state that detection is based on "identical IP address, device, deposit/withdrawal patterns" and "matching transaction patterns." The terms and conditions also outline measures to be taken if a violation is detected, ranging from invalidating transactions and forfeiting profits to refusing withdrawals and freezing all accounts.
- The statement that "domestic FX trading is restricted from hedging by regulations from the Financial Services Agency" is inaccurate. Article 117, Paragraph 1, Item 26 of the Cabinet Office Ordinance concerning Financial Instruments Business, etc., prohibitssoliciting hedging, not customers actually engaging in hedging (the article is quoted in the main text).
*This article was created by the MoneyCharger editorial team in accordance with their content creation policy . The handling of hedging by each company was confirmed on September 9, 2026, using the original text of the official terms of service, agreements, and official FAQs (including the English version), the currently enforced articles of the domestic regulations from the e-Gov legal search , and the specifications of the trading platform from MetaQuotes' official documentation (article numbers and confirmation dates are clearly stated in the text). Since terms and conditions may be revised, please be sure to check the latest terms and conditions for your own account before actually using them. Overseas FX brokers are not registered with the Japanese Financial Services Agency, and the Financial Services Agency and the Consumer Affairs Agency have issued warnings about trading with unregistered brokers. This article is for general informational purposes only and does not endorse any specific trading method.
If you are new to overseas forex trading,our complete guide for overseas forex trading beginners.
What is hedging in overseas forex trading? Why is it called a "surefire winning strategy," and what is it really like?
Hedging involves simultaneously holding both a buy and a sell position in the same currency pair. For example, if you buy one lot of USD/JPY and then sell one lot of the same USD/JPY, you are hedging. In this situation, whether the market goes up or down, the unrealized profit and loss on one position increase by the same amount, so the profit or loss due to price movements is fixed at "the level at that moment . "

It's called a "surefire winning strategy" because it appears to stop losses
Hedging has been called a "surefire winning strategy," "ultimate method," and "secret technique" becauseto stop losses from escalating without the need for stop-loss orders. By placing an opposing position against a position that is currently showing a loss, the profit or loss appears to be fixed at that point, making it seem as though the account balance will no longer decrease. In fact, it has been used in the following ways:
- I don't want to cut my losses on a position that's currently at a loss, so I'm going to "stop it for now" by making an opposing trade
- Hedging existing positions before announcements such as US employment statistics or FOMC meetings, where the direction of the market is uncertain
- Sell at the upper limit of the range-bound market, buy at the lower limit, and hold both positions to profit from the price movement
- I repeatedly buy and sell, adjusting my positional imbalance while waiting for a clear direction
Both methods work in the sense that they allow you to postpone a decision. The problem is thatcosts continue to increase while you're postponing.
Why it's not a guaranteed winning strategy | Profits and losses may offset each other, but costs do not
With a hedging strategy, only the profit or loss from price movements is fixed . The three costs associated with the transaction are not offset and remain as they are.
| cost | What happens with hedging? | When it comes into play |
|---|---|---|
| spread | Buying and selling transactions occur separately.Both transactions are finalized the moment the trade is opened, and these amounts are not refunded even after settlement. | From the moment it's built. It increases even more if you pay for both the outbound and return trips |
| Swap points | This occurs in both long and short positions . The positive and negative amounts do not cancel each other out by equal amounts. | Each day that passes. The longer you hold it, the more it accumulates |
| margin | Depending on the broker's settings, it may be the case that no hedging is required at all, or that it is required for both sides (see broker-specific treatment below). | Capital efficiency. For brokers that require both sides, the lot size that can be held with the same amount of capital is halved |
In other words, hedgingnot a way to eliminate losses, but a way to buy time. You continue to pay a cost for the time you've bought, so the longer you leave it open, the more disadvantageous it becomes. When you undo hedging (close one side), you're ultimately back to the initial decision of "which direction to bet on," and it's important to remember that you're simply postponing that decision.
If you come across explanations like "You can never lose with hedging" or "You can make a profit without taking any risk," check where those costs are going. If you ignore spreads, swaps, or margin, the calculation won't hold true. Hedging based on the premise of risk-free profits is explicitly prohibited in each company's terms and conditions, as will be explained later
Advantages of using hedging in overseas forex trading
While I wrote that it's not a guaranteed winning strategy, it's not entirely useless. Itfunctions as a tool to postpone decisions in situations where you don't want to close a position but also don't want to increase your losses further. I'll summarize the practical benefits, including those specific to overseas forex trading.
You can fix your profits and losses without cutting your losses and postpone making a decision
The biggest advantage is this: When you place an opposing position of the same lot size against a position that is currently showing a loss, the profit or loss due to price movements stops at that point. The practical benefit of hedging is that it temporarily puts aside the psychological impasse of "I don't want to cut my losses, but I can't bear it any longer."
However, this does not mean that the loss has disappeared. The unrealized loss remains fixed in the account, the spread is still charged, and swaps accrue daily. If youhedge without deciding "when and under what conditions you will make a decision to postpone it," you will only end up paying costs while holding onto a losing position. It is essential to decide in advance the conditions for closing the positions (e.g., close the sell position if the price returns to this level, or close both positions if the price does not move by this date) before hedging.
It can cross events where the direction is unpredictable, such as the release of economic indicators
When an announcement such as US employment statistics, CPI, or FOMC results are released and the direction of the market is uncertain until then, taking an opposing position of the same lot size as your existing position just before the announcement can help you avoid being affected by the sharp fluctuations immediately following the announcement. The difference is that you can weather the event without changing the entry price of your existing position , rather than closing and rebuilding it. The same idea applies to hedging long-term long positions held for the purpose of earning swap points only during short-term downturns.
There are some points to be aware of when using this method.HFM's Terms of Service 27.1 explicitly states that "trading that aims for risk-free profits by placing opposing orders during periods of high volatility, economic indicator announcements, or gap openings" is prohibited (see below). The prohibition applies to "aiming for risk-free profits" rather than hedging itself, but it is important to be aware that repeatedly using hedging strategies that span economic indicator announcements is on the borderline from the broker's perspective.
If you use a broker that offsets margin, you can hedge without reducing capital efficiency
The handling of margin required for hedging varies depending on the broker and platform.MetaTrader 5 has a margin calculation mechanism called "Hedged Margin." The official MetaTrader 5 help explains that for positions in opposite directions of the same instrument, "there are two possible margin calculation methods for such positions. The calculation method is determined by the broker" (confirmed September 9, 2026). In other words, whether the margin for hedging becomes zero depends on the broker's settings.
With an account set up for offsetting, you don't need to prepare additional margin for hedging, so you can lock in your position without lowering your margin maintenance ratio. Conversely, with an account set up for non-offsetting, the required margin doubles the moment you hedge, and your maintenance ratio plummets.The comparison of brokers belowwill clarify which brokers and platforms are which.
Since there are no margin calls, even if a hedging strategy fails, the loss will not exceed the initial deposit
Hedging is not an "absolutely safe state." If the margin maintenance ratio falls and triggers a stop-loss, one side may be forcibly closed, breaking the hedged position, and the remaining side may unilaterally incur increasing losses.AXIORYofficial FAQ also warns that "even if you maintain a complete hedged position, if the hedged position is closed due to reasons such as price fluctuations or increases or decreases in swap points that fail to meet the surplus margin requirement, the required margin will be incurred" (confirmed September 9, 2026)
In that sense, overseas forex brokers that employ zero-cut (no margin calls) have the advantage of limiting losses to the initial deposit amount in the worst-case scenario, which is an advantage not found in domestic forex brokers. However, zero-cut applies to "normal trading within the scope of the terms and conditions," and it is clearly stated in each company's terms and conditions that it will not apply if it is determined to fall under the prohibited categories described later. For more details, please refer to the explanation of why there are no margin calls in overseas forex
Relationship with cashback | While trading volume can increase even with hedging, doing so for that purpose violates the terms of service
Since cashback rewards from cashback sites are calculated based on the number of trading lots, the idea arises that "if you use hedging, you can accumulate lots without taking on the risk of price fluctuations." Let us clearly state our position on this point:This is an action that is explicitly prohibited by the terms of service of major brokers.
- XM Terms of Service 47.4 — The list of grounds for invalidating trades and profits/losses explicitly includes " cash- back arbitrage."
- Exness Client Agreement Part C 2.5 lists " cash-back/bonus arbitrage " and " trading with the sole aim of generating third-party commissions" as prohibited trading methods.
- XM's Introducer Agreement, Clause 3, excludes "trades settled using the close by and multiple close by functions" and "trades with a holding time of 5 minutes or less" from the calculation of IB commissions. Close by is a dedicated function in MT4 for offsetting and settling hedged positions, and this clause specifically disables this technique.
If it is determined that the transaction is in violation of the terms and conditions, the transaction and profit/loss will be invalidated, the IB commission which is the source of the cashback will be canceled, and measures such as freezing the account and refusing withdrawals may also be included in the terms and conditions. The specific clauses and measures taken by each company will be covered in detail in "Hedging for the purpose of cashback and IB commissions."
Conversely, there is nothing wrong with receiving cashback on trades made based on your own market analysis using an account opened through a third-party cashback site . There is a significant difference in how the terms and conditions are treated between accumulating lots as a result of normal trading, including hedging, and repeatedly making risk-free trades solely for the purpose of receiving cashback. The cashback mechanism itself is explained in " What is Cashback in Overseas Forex?"
Disadvantages and Costs of Hedging | Spread, Swap, and Margin
The costs of hedging are definitely accumulating behind the scenes, even though it may seem like "nothing is happening because the profit and loss are fixed." Here, we will break down the three costs—spread, swap, and margin—in terms of how much they actually cost
These three points also coincide with the disadvantages cited by supervisory authorities. The Financial Services Agency's "Comprehensive Supervisory Guidelines for Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc." (August 2026 edition) lists three points that businesses should mention when instructing customers to engage in hedging:"the fact that fees will be charged twice, that there is a risk of negative spreads due to interest rate differential adjustments between currencies (hereinafter referred to as "swap points"), and that customers will bear the price difference between the buying and selling prices based on the mid-rate (the so-called "spread received by over-the-counter financial futures trading operators")." The agency positions hedging as a "transaction that may lack economic rationality" (IV-3-3-2 (4) ②, confirmed September 9, 2026). Below, we will look at how much these three points amount to in overseas FX trading.
The spread is fixed for two trades the moment the position is opened
This is the most easily overlooked cost. When you open a buy position, you incur a loss equal to the spread, and if you add a sell position on top of that, you incur another loss.The moment you hedge, you start with a realized unrealized loss equal to two spreads.
Furthermore, while there is no spread when closing a position by unwinding a hedged position, the spread accumulates with each subsequent hedging and unwinding. Strategies such as choosing an account type with a narrow spread and comparing the actual cost including fees are covered in our overseas FX spread comparison
Swaps occur for both buying and selling, and the total is negative
When a position is held overnight, swap points are incurred for both the buy and sell positions. Theoretically, the positive and negative swap points should cancel each other out based on the interest rate difference, but this is not the case in reality.We collected the swap values published by eight companies and added up the buy and sell swaps for the same security(obtained from each company's official website on September 9, 2026. The values fluctuate daily).
| Contractor | USD/JPY | EURUSD | Gold (XAUUSD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| XMTrading | -$27.49(Buy +2.11 / Sell -29.60) | -$6.44 | -$83.50 |
| TitanFX | -approximately $6.65(buy +approximately $3.11 / sell -approximately $9.76) | -$5.14 | -$45.27 |
| HFM | -24.8 points (-approx. $15.50). This cannot be offset as the buy position is 0.0. | -8.3 points (-8.30 dollars) | -74.11 points (-74.11 dollars) |
| FXGT | -24.11 points (-approximately $15.07) | -7.21 points (-7.21 dollars) | Not listed in the official catalog |
| BigBoss | -16.90 points (-approximately $10.56) | -5.91 points (-5.91 dollars) | -11.55 points (-11.55 dollars) |
| ThreeTrader | -14.67 points (-approximately $9.17) | -4.82 points (-4.82 dollars) | -18.40 points (-18.40 dollars) |
| AXIORY | -9.71 points (-approximately $6.07). The smallest among those tallied. | -3.52 points (-3.52 dollars) | -56.52 points (-56.52 dollars) |
| IS6FX | -23.83.Both buy and sell positions are negative(buy -0.97 / sell -22.86). | −9.78Both sides are negative | −51.27 |
| Axi・Exness | Unable to obtain individual swap values from the public page (Exnessrequires login to view the trading conditions page).Unconfirmed | ||
*All values are per lot, per day, total of buy and sell. XM figures are from the official information site "XMTrading Labo" (data date: September 8, 2026), TitanFX figures are from the official swap point calendar (actual values: September 8, 2026), and others are from each company's official trading conditions page or official swap list. The yen/dollar conversion values are calculated by our editorial department based on the contract size of 1 lot (USDJPY is approximately $0.63 per point, and dollar-denominated instruments are $1 per point. This conversion formulaFXGTandThreeTradermatches the official descriptions onFXGTvalues are as of March 9, 2026, andThreeTradervalues were updated on July 15, 2026.IS6FXhas ). not been converted as there is no unit listed on its official page
For all 8 companies and 23 instruments for which data was available, the combined buy and sell swaps were negative.Even for instruments like USDJPY, where you can receive positive swaps when buying, XM received +$2.11 while paying -$29.60, resulting in a net loss of -$27.49 per day.HFMinstruments have the receiving side set to 0.0, in which casethe positive side does not offset at all.IS6FX, in particular, shows negative swaps for both buy and sell for both USDJPY and EURUSD, meaning thatswaps are paid regardless of the direction the position is held.
The companies themselves explain the reasons.BigBossstates on its official website that "BigBossaims to reduce procurement costs by offering more attractive positive swap rates to customers on the side of a tilted, smaller position," and that swaps are determined not only by the interest rate difference between the two countries but also by the company's procurement costs added on top . That's why when you add up the buy and sell swaps, a negative result remains.Axi, in its product description (effective July 6, 2026), states even more directly that " under certain interest rate market conditions, swap rates may be negative for both buy and sell positions ."
Here's a calculation to give you a sense of the costs. Comparing the total USD/JPY in yen across seven companies (IS6FX; XM displays in US dollars, but when converted to yen, it's the largest among the seven companies regardless of the exchange rate), the median was approximately -$10.56 per day. Swaps are not applied on weekends and are added as a lump sum for three days, so if you hold a position for a month, it will roughly add up to the number of days in the calendar.If you leave a 1-lot hedged position open for a month, the cost for USD/JPY would be approximately $312.50(this is our editorial team's calculation, which extends the median to 30 days. Actual amounts will vary greatly depending on the broker, instrument, and time of year).
If the swap period spans three days, the cost will triple for that day only
There are days when the swap points for the entire weekend are credited at once, and if you hold positions across those days, the cost of hedging will triple. TitanFX's official swap point calendar publishes daily actual values, so you can compare them for the same instrument
| TitanFX USD/JPY (September 2026) | Sell | Buy | Total for one day of hedging |
|---|---|---|---|
| September 1st (Tuesday)/Normal | -approximately $9.79 | +approximately $3.12 | -approximately $6.67 |
| September 3rd (Thursday)/Normal | -approximately $9.76 | +approx. $3.11 | -approximately $6.65 |
| September 2nd (Wednesday) / 3-day grant | -approximately $29.27 | +approximately $9.32 | -approximately $19.95 |
| September 5th (Sat) and September 6th (Sun) | approx. $0.00 | approx. $0.00 | approx. $0.00 |
The day of the week when the 3-day bonus is credited varies depending on the broker and the product.FXGTofficially states that "FX currency pairs, precious metals, and energy are credited on Wednesdays, and stock indices, stocks, and cryptocurrencies are credited on Fridays,"ThreeTraderofficially states that "3 days' worth of bonuses are credited at 7 AM on Thursdays." while If you hold a hedged position for a week, you will inevitably cross this day at least once
Does a swap-free account eliminate the costs of hedging?
The idea of simply using a swap-free (Islamic) account might come to mind, butit's not that simple. Upon reviewing the terms and conditions of each company, you'll find the following four obstacles:
- —XM,AXIORY, andExnessYou can't even apply in the first place require religious reasons and explicitly state in their terms and conditions that they have the right to request proof of religious belief.AXIORYrequires proof of Muslim status and a signed swap-free agreement, and existing accounts will be closed.
- There are limits on the number of days you can hold a position—TitanFX allows a maximum of 3 consecutive days,FXGTallows 6 days for PRO accounts and 2 days for Optimus accounts. Furthermore,FXGT's PRO account excludes currency pairs involving the Japanese yen (such as USD/JPY), and stock indices are excluded from all accounts.
- If you exceed the limit, a management fee will be charged—TitanFX charges a daily management fee if you exceed the limit, andthis fee applies even on weekends.Exnessalso stipulates in its terms and conditions 9.1 that it may charge a management fee.
- Trading aimed at profiting from interest rate differentials is prohibited —XM 60.4,AXIORY 19.7,Exness Part E 5.13, andFXGT 16.8.8 specifically prohibit "carry trades" and "trading strategies that exploit swap-free periods." Violators face penalties including revocation of swap-free periods, retroactive collection of uncalculated swaps, invalidation of trades, cancellation of profits, and closure of all accounts
In other words, swap-free accountsare not designed as a tool to eliminate the costs of hedging. If you want to lower the costs of long-term holding, you must first check whether you meet the conditions for using such an account.
The required margin for hedging varies depending on the broker and platform
There is no standardized rule regarding how the required margin changes when you have both long and short positions. The official MetaTrader 5 help documentation states that for positions in opposite directions of the same instrument, "There are two possible margin calculation methods for such positions. The calculation method is determined by the broker" (confirmed September 9, 2026). The actual settings confirmed from the official information of the top 10 brokers were as follows:
| Contractor | Required margin when a complete hedging strategy is implemented within the same account | source |
|---|---|---|
| Exness | 0%(The official specifications list "Hedged margin 0%") | Official account type page |
| FXGT | 0%Terms and Conditions 14.11.1 clearly state that "no margin is required for fully hedged accounts." | Official Terms PDF v1.14 |
| HFM | 0%(Zero Hedge Margin). The margin is zero only for the portion where the quantities match, and only for the portion where partial hedging matches. The behavior is the same across WebTrader, the app, MT4, and MT5 | Official FAQ |
| AXIORY | MT4/MT5 offsets (only the difference) / cTrader does not offset(only the larger lot size is offset) | Official FAQ (Japanese) |
| XMTrading | FX, gold, and silver are 0% / all other instruments are 50% | Official Help Center |
| Axi | MT4 requires half the standard margin / Proprietary platform (ATP) does not allow hedging(automatic netting is performed). | Official Help |
| TitanFXIS6FX | While the possibility of hedging is officially stated,the handling of margin cannot be confirmed in the official information. | — |
| BigBoss・ThreeTrader | The official information does not allow for hedging or for how margin is handled(ThreeTraderthoroughly reviewed the official FAQ and confirmed that no such questions exist). | — |
*Confirmed on September 9, 2026, on each company's official website.Exnesswas obtained via the Wayback Machine, so version differences have not been confirmed.Axiis from the June 2025 update of the official help documentation. "Unable to confirm" means that the information is not listed in the official information that was obtained
The common three-category classification of "0%, MAX, or both sides required" does not accurately reflect the reality.Some brokers, like XM, differentiate by instrument,AXIORYandAxi, differentiate by platform. In particular,AXIORYofficial FAQ states that "when engaging in hedging, the method for calculating the required margin amount differs depending on the trading tool," and explains it as follows:
| Example at AXIORY | MT4/MT5 | cTrader |
|---|---|---|
| Buy 3 lots + sell 3 lots (perfect hedging) | The required marginwill be offset. | Three lotswill be included in the calculation. |
| Buy 3 lots + Sell 2 lots (partial hedging) | One lot(difference) will be accounted for. | Three lots(the larger of the three lots) will be included in the calculation. |
Even with the same broker, the same instrument, and the same lot size, simply choosing cTrader triples the required margin.Axiwhile holding both buy and sell positions in the same instrument, is even more extreme; its official help states that "MT4 allows both partial and full hedging, and half the standard margin is charged " while its proprietary platform ATP states that " hedging is not currently permitted, and attempting to hedge with ATP will result in netting of positions ." This means that if you place a 0.04 lot buy order and a 0.04 lot sell order, they will offset each other and be automatically closed. You should not blindly accept information such as "this broker has zero margin for hedging," but rather check how it is handled on the platform you use
AXIORYofficial FAQ also warns that, "Even if you maintain a complete hedged position, ifthe hedged position is closed due to reasons such as price fluctuations or increases or decreases in swap points that prevent you from meeting the required margin, the required margin will be incurred. After that, there is a risk of forced liquidation depending on your account balance." Hedging is not a "state where you will not be liquidated."
When a hedging strategy fails, the remaining side unilaterally incurs significant losses
Even with a hedged position, if negative swaps accumulate, your effective margin will continue to decrease. If the margin maintenance ratio touches the stop-loss level, your positionsbe forcibly closed one side at a time. In that case, you'll be left with only one side of your position, and the market is moving in an unfavorable direction. What was supposed to be a hedged position ends up with only one side of your position remaining at the worst possible time.
This is not speculation;the company itself has officially stated.
| Contractor | Official description |
|---|---|
| FXGT(Terms and Conditions 14.11.1) | "Even with a fully hedged account, a stop-out can occur. While a fully hedged account doesn't require margin, the effective margin is affected by fluctuations.If the spread widens, fluctuations increase, and if they exceed the effective margin, a stop-out will occur." |
| AXIORY(Official FAQ) | "Even when holding a complete hedged order, ifone of the trades is forced to liquidate due to unrealized losses from swaps, etc., the hedged order will be canceled, and the necessary margin will be required to hold the opposite position." |
| TitanFX(Official Help) | "Even with a perfect hedging order, if losses occur due to factors such as swap or spread widening, or during periods of high market volatility due to economic indicators, and themargin requirement falls below the minimum required amount, a stop-loss order will be triggered." |
| HFM(Official FAQ) | "If one side of a fully hedged position is closed,the remaining position immediately returns to the standard margin requirement." |
| IS6FX(Official FAQ) | "Losses may occur due to the widening of swaps and spreads." |
All five companies are saying the same thing:Hedging does not eliminate risk, and it collapses through three means: ① unrealized losses due to widening spreads, ② accumulation of swap costs, and ③ the forced liquidation of one side, which cancels the hedging.
Since the stop-loss levels and execution order differ from broker to broker, if you intend to hold a hedged position for an extended period, it is recommended that you check the stop-loss criteria of your overseas forex broker beforehand
The timing of lifting the restrictions is the final decision that has been postponed
The biggest challenge with hedging isn't opening the positions, but closing them. Once you close one position, the risk returns to that of the remaining, one-way side. Deciding "which position to close and when" is just as difficult as the initial decision-making process. You need to keep in mind throughout the entire time you're paying the costs that hedging doesn't solve the problem; it merely postpones the decision
In practical terms, the only solution is to define the "cancellation conditions" numerically before opening a hedged position. Opening a hedged position without defining these conditions only makes the decision to cancel it even more difficult, and ultimately, the balance will continue to decrease
In MT5 netting accounts, hedging is not possible in the first place
This is an easily overlooked feature. MetaTrader 5two position accounting systems, "netting" and "hedging,"and MetaQuotes' official help explains that "the system used varies depending on the account and is set by the broker" (confirmed September 9, 2026).
| method | Behavior when placing opposing orders for the same stock |
|---|---|
| Hedging method | "A stock can hold multiple positions , including positions in the opposite direction ." A new position is added, and the existing position remains unchanged = a hedged position is established. |
| Netting method | "Each instrumentcan only hold one common position." A trade in the opposite direction reduces the quantity of the existing position, resulting in settlement or reversal—hedge trading is not possible. |
If you place an opposing order in a netting account with the intention of "hedging," it will nothedge your position; instead, it will close your existing position. The official help also explains that it doesn't matter what triggered the opposite execution (whether it was a market order or a pending order), and the same applies to orders placed by EAs.
Based on the official information from the 10 companies we investigated, we could not find any brokers that explicitly state they use nettingAxi's proprietary platform ATP officially specifies netting behavior). However, this is an item that can be set for each account type in MT5, so for their MT4/MT5 accounts (however, as mentioned earlier, it is safer to check the behavior with a small amount before trying to place an opposing order using the quote display after opening an account . When running EAs on MT4/MT5 , this difference can lead to unexpected settlements.
[By Business Type] What is permitted and what is a violation?
While it's often said that whether or not hedging is permitted "varies from broker to broker," a closer look at the terms of service and official help documents of each company reveals thatthe difference lies not in "whether or not hedging is permitted," but in "what types of hedging are prohibited." We have organized the terms of service of 10 major companies into three categories with article numbers (all confirmed on September 9, 2026).

| Contractor | Hedging within the same account | Between multiple accounts of the same broker | Between different industries (between other companies) |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() XMTrading | Yes. The official help section clearly states that "you can hedge positions in all trading accounts." The margin requirement for hedging is 0% for FX, gold, and silver, and 50% for other instruments. | Not possible. The same official help section clearly states, "You cannot hedge between two different accounts." | clause specifically mentioning hedging with other companieswas found. However, Article 47.4 invalidates "internal hedging in coordination with others" and "any arbitrage, including risk-free profits." |
![]() Exness | The terms and conditions clearly anticipate this. Part A defines "Hedged Positions," and Part D sections 3.1, 3.6, and 3.9 stipulate the calculation of margin when hedging. It also stipulates that even during a margin call, hedges to reduce margin can be established only if approved by the company. | Part C 2.5 lists "internal hedging within a customer's own account and in coordination with others" as a prohibited type of transaction. It also explicitly states thatthe same IP address, the same terminal, the same deposit/withdrawal patterns, and similar transaction patternsare criteria for determining whether multiple accounts are being operated. | clause specifically mentioning hedging with other companieswas found. Part C 2.5, which deals with "risk-free profits" and "trading patterns that aim solely for financial gain without taking market risk," may apply. |
![]() FXGT | Terms and Conditions 14.11.1 explicitly states that "no margin is required for fully hedged accounts." However, the same clause warns that stop-outs are possible due to unrealized losses caused by widening spreads | Section 8.6 explicitly states that it applies to " hedging using trading accounts under the same profile ." Section 8.6 also states " whether voluntary or involuntary ," meaning that unintentional hedging may also be covered. | It is explicitly covered . Section 8.6 specifically mentions " external hedging connected to third parties ." |
![]() TitanFX | it is possible. The official help sectionTitan FXclearly states, "Yes, you can use hedging in | it is "not covered by zero-cut." The official help section clearly states that "hedging transactions aimed at zero-cut, such as those between multiple accounts or between different brokers (two or more brokers) are not covered by zero-cut." | Same as above.It's not prohibited, but ratherwritten as "we won't compensate for any negative balances." Furthermore, it's limited to hedging strategies such as "aiming for zero cuts." |
![]() HFM | No clause prohibiting hedging in generalcould be found. Article 27.1 prohibits "the act of placing opposing orders in order to aim for risk-free profits," and even then,it is limited to situations such as during sudden market changes, when economic indicators are announced, or when there is a gap in the market. | Section 10.13 warns that "we will not offset opposing positions opened in multiple accounts. Rollover costs will continue to be incurred on both unless you manually close them." The prohibition in Section 27.1 applies "whether in the same account or different accounts." | No clauses specifically mentioning hedging with other companies were found |
![]() AXIORY | Yes. The official FAQ clearly states that "hedging is possible within the same trading account."MT4/MT5 offsets margin, while cTrader does not. | clauses specifically mentioning hedgingwere found. Clauses 14.6(a) and 30.6 of the regulations deal with arbitrage, abuse of off-market rates, and latency arbitrage, and do not mention hedging. | Same as above. No specific articles were identified |
![]() ThreeTrader | This cannot be found in the official FAQ . However, section 9.7 lists " internal/external hedging " as an example of price manipulation without limitation (it is triggered "when we determine that price, execution, or platform have been manipulated"). | The definition includes "a single trader trading multiple accounts simultaneously," "identical electronic identification information," and "deposit and withdrawal patterns." | The definition of "external hedging" applies. "Interactions with other account holders" is also listed. |
![]() BigBoss | mention of this in the official guidelinescould be found. | Prohibited. The official guidelines explicitly state that "hedging with excessive risk using multiple accounts" is an unfair trading practice. Trading from multiple accounts from the same IP address is also subject to this restriction as name lending. | mention of hedging with other companieswas found. |
![]() Axi | MT4 is supported(official help; both partial and full hedging are permitted,with half the standard margin requirement).Proprietary platforms like ATPare not supported; attempting to hedge will automatically net the position. | No specific article was found to be mentioned | No specific clause was found to be named . Furthermore, the definition of price manipulation includes the word " deliberately, " of the 10 companies that includes a deliberate requirement in its definition of price manipulation.Axithe only one |
![]() IS6FX | Yes. The official FAQ clearly states that "hedging is permitted only within the same account." It also prohibits "trading with similar currency pairsof the 10 companies that specifically mentions pseudo-hedging using correlated but different pairs.IS6FXthe only one | Prohibited. Article 12 of the Terms of Service lists "the act of holding multiple accounts with our company and conducting hedging transactions" as a prohibited act. | Prohibited. Article 12 specifically lists "the act of depositing money into two or more brokers and conducting hedging transactionsso clearly states that hedging between different brokers is prohibited.IS6FXonly |
*Source and version: XM = Official Japanese Help Center "Do you allow hedging?" (Current version confirmed live on September 9, 2026) and Client Agreement (June 2024 archived version) 47.3, 47.4, 9.1.34, Introducer Agreement (February 2026 archived version) Sections 3 and 9 /Exness= Client Agreement July 24, 2026 version Part A, Part C 2.5, Part D /FXGT= Terms and Conditions v1.14 (December 2024 version) 2.6, 8.6, 8.8, 14.11.1 / TitanFX = Official Help Center (Updated June 4, 2026) /HFM= Account Opening Agreement January 2023 version 10.13, 27.1 /AXIORY= Official FAQ "General Trading Conditions" and Terms on Investment Services 14.6(a)・30.6 /ThreeTrader= Client Agreement September 2023 Edition 9.7 /BigBoss= Official Guidelines "Rules Regarding Unfair Trading" /Axi= Client Agreement Effective July 7, 2026 Edition 6.2 /IS6FX= Terms of Use Article 12 and Official FAQ "Is hedging allowed?" /AxiOfficial Help "What trading strategies are allowed?" (Updated June 2025)."Not confirmed" means that the wording could not be found in the official documents obtained, and does not mean that it is permitted.Quotes from the English terms and conditions are translated by our editorial team, and the original text is included alongside any potentially ambiguous terms. Also, since terms and conditions are subject to revision, please always check the latest terms and conditions for your own account before making any decisions.
What can be gleaned from this table
- None of the 10 brokers prohibit hedging within the same account on MT4 or MT5that officially state they allow itAXIORY, andIS6FXare the only fourAxialso states that it allows both partial and full hedging on MT4, andExnessandFXGTeven specify how margin is calculated when hedging in their terms and conditions. WeHFM,ThreeTrader, orBigBosscould not find any official statements regarding hedging within the same accountThe only exception isAxi's proprietary platform (ATP), where their official help section explicitly states that "hedging is not currently permitted"(attempts will result in automatic offsetting of the opposite trade). The statement that "hedging is prohibited in overseas forex trading" does not apply to the MT4 and MT5 platforms of these 10 brokers, at least.
- When it comes to multiple accounts, the treatment varies clearly. XM,BigBoss, andIS6FXexplicitly prohibit it, TitanFX does not apply it to zero-cut transactions, andExness,FXGT,HFM, andThreeTraderhave clauses that could potentially be interpreted as prohibitions.Eight out of ten companies mention multiple accounts in some form.
- Four companies are specifically named in relation to other brokers . Of these, IS6FX,FXGT, andThreeTradercompanies are listed as prohibited activities , while TitanFX is described as "not covered by zero-cut" rather than "prohibited." The remaining six are not specifically named in the clauses, but the general clause in XM 47.4 andExness Part C 2.5 regarding "risk-free trading" can apply regardless of the format. The absence of a specific clause does not mean that it is not a problem to do so.
Another point to keep in mind is thatall of their terms and conditions state that they will make a decision "at our discretion." XM states "any indication or suspicion at XMTRADING's sole discretion,ThreeTraderstates "if we believe," andBigBossstates "based on the overall judgment of our monitoring team."It is the broker that decides whether or not a violation has occurred, and there is no guarantee that the customer will have a procedure to appeal.ThreeTradereven stipulates that unless the customer provides "conclusive evidence that they have not violated" within 30 days, any trades that were in the customer's favor will be treated as invalid from the start.
The handling of hedging varies from broker to broker. You can open an account through Moneycha, where you can earn cashback
Prohibited hedging and penalties
When comparing the terms and conditions of 10 companies, the prohibited type of hedging can be categorized into five patterns . What they all have in common is that the judgment is based not on the "form of hedging," but on " whether or not one is trying to make a profit without taking market risk ."
① Hedging between multiple accounts with the same broker
This is the type of transaction that the most brokers specifically mention. XM clearly states in its official help section that "hedging between two different accounts is not permitted,"IS6FXlists "the act of holding multiple accounts with our company and conducting hedging transactions" as a prohibited act in Article 12 of its Terms of Service, andBigBossconsiders "high-risk hedging transactions using multiple accounts" to be unfair trading in its official guidelines
The reason this is considered problematic is clear. Within the same account, margins are offset, and profits and losses are settled within that account. However, if accounts are separated,wipe out one account with a zero cut while keeping the profits in the other. That is why conditions for detecting multiple accounts are written in the terms and conditions.Exness Client Agreement Part C 2.5 specifies the following as criteria for determination:
- Accounts operated from the same location
- Accounts using or showing the same IP address, ID, phone number, etc
- Multiple accounts with the same deposit and withdrawal pattern
- Accounts with similar or identical trading patterns
- Accounts sharing the same device
BigBossalso states that it will treat it as name lending if it is discovered or determined that "transactions from multiple users and accounts are being conducted from the same or similar IP addresses," andThreeTraderdefines price manipulation as "identical electronic identification information" and "deposit and withdrawal patterns." While creating multiple accounts is permitted by many brokers, it's a different story if you use them to take opposing positions . How to differentiate between multiple accounts is covered in the section on multiple accounts in overseas forex trading
② Hedging between different brokers (hedging between different brokers)
This involves buying from company A and selling to company B. This area tends to attract attention because of the idea that "it won't be tracked unless it's between the same companies," but when we checked the original terms and conditions, only4 out of 10 companies specifically mentioned transactions between different companies, and of those, 3 listed it as a prohibited activity.
| Contractor | How to write regulations regarding hedging between different brokers |
|---|---|
| IS6FX | Article 12 of the Terms of Service explicitly states " the act of depositing money into two or more brokers and engaging in hedging transactions ." Of the 10 companies, this is the most direct |
| FXGT | Section 8.6 explicitly states "external hedging connected to third parties." However, the main focus of the clause is on zero-cut and the abuse of bonuses. |
| TitanFX | "Hedging transactions, such as those aimed at zero-cut protection, between multiple brokers (two or more brokers) are not covered by zero-cut protection." This is not a prohibition, but rather a system where negative balances will not be compensated. |
| ThreeTrader | 9.7 defines price manipulation as including "internal/external hedging." It is triggered "when we determine that price, execution, or the platform has been manipulated." |
| XM・Exness・HFM・AXIORY・BigBoss・Axi | clauses specifically naming other brokerswere found. However, the terms "risk-free profit" and "trading patterns that aim solely for financial gain without taking market risk" in XM 47.4 andExness Part C 2.5 may apply regardless of the form. |
What's important to understand here isthat the absence of a specific clause and the fact that it's not considered problematic are two differentthings. Each company's general clauses are written with the purpose (gaining profit without taking risk) in mind, not the form of the action. Even between different companies, if the design assumes one party will be wiped out with a zero-cut, then that clause applies.
③ A hedging strategy where one side is intentionally closed out in order to aim for a zero cut
This is the real reason why hedging across multiple accounts and different brokers is considered problematic. The zero-cut system (no margin calls) is designed to prevent customers from incurring debt due to unexpected and sudden fluctuations, and the funds for this system are borne by the broker.Designing a strategy to intentionally close one account to shift the debt onto the broker while securing profits on the other account directly contradicts the purpose of the system.
Each company's clauses specifically address this point. XM 47.4 lists "abuse of our zero-cut (no negative balance) policy,"Exness Part C 2.5 similarly lists "misuse of the negative balance policy," andFXGT 8.6 lists "improper use of Negative Balance Protection" as grounds for invalidation. TitanFX clearly states in its official help section that "if we determine that a transaction has been an abuse or misuse of the zero-cut system, we may not provide zero-cut compensation."
If zero-cut is not applied, your account will remain with a negative balance. According to the terms and conditions, only the principal deposit will be refunded, andIS6FXexplicitly states in its terms and conditions that "if an account is frozen or terminated, we are not obligated to refund any funds in the accountThis means that hedging strategies aimed at zero-cut could result in losses exceeding the initial deposit amount if they fail.
④ Hedging using bonus
This involves using account opening bonuses and deposit bonuses to hedge positions across multiple accounts in an attempt to make profits without risk. This practice is explicitly prohibited by each company.IS6FX"fraudulent trading across multiple accounts using bonuses" and "arbitrage trading using bonuses" in Article 13,BigBossprohibits "high-risk trading that exploits loopholes in the bonuses and zero-cut system provided by the company," andFXGTprohibits the abuse of bonus and incentive programs in Article 8.6 of its terms and conditions. The measures taken prohibits include the immediate forfeiture of bonuses and exclusion from all future bonus programs
The relationship between bonuses and hedging is complex, so this site provides individual explanations on overseas forex bonus hedging, including how each type of bonus is handled and whether or not it has a cushioning function
⑤ Hedging for the purpose of cashback and IB commissions
This is something we must clearly state, given that this site is a cashback site. The method of "using hedging to accumulate lots without taking risk from price fluctuations and earning cashback and IB commissions" is explicitly prohibited by the terms and conditions of major brokers. Moreover, not only is it prohibited, but there are clauses that exclude it from the commission calculation formula itself
The terms of service specifically mention "cashback arbitrage" and "transactions for the purpose of rewards."
| Contractor/Article Number | Relevant wording in the terms and conditions |
|---|---|
| XM 47.4 | The list of grounds for invalidating transactions and profits/losses explicitly includes "cash-back arbitrage." |
| XM 9.1.34 | The definition of "Fraud Traffic" includes "cash back arbitrage" and "offers to share rewards or bonuses directly or indirectly with traders." |
| Exness Part C 2.5 | The prohibited trading methods explicitly state "cash-back/bonus arbitrage," "trading with the sole aim of generating third-partycommissions," and "hedging in bad faith." |
| Exness Part E 5.13 | "cash-back arbitrage" is detected in a swap-free account, the swap-free status may be revoked, unaccounted swaps may be retroactively collected, all accounts may be closed, and all transactions may be invalidated. |
| FXGT 2.6 | "Cashback arbitrage" is explicitly stated as a reason for invalidating all related transactions and profits/losses. |
| Axi 6.2(h) | Although the word "arbitration" is not used, the agreement stipulates thatorders can be canceled, positions forcibly liquidated, andexecuted trades reversed if there are reasonable grounds to believe that an order has been placed in a manner that deviates from the spirit of the rebate agreement or with the intent to fraudulently generate rebates. |
| IS6FX Article 12 | While the term "cashback arbitrage" is not used, the prohibited acts include " trading activities that unfairly obtain trading rewards ." The measure of "freezing rewards" is also stipulated |
| AXIORY 19.7 | A "cashback arbitrage" provision is established. However,it is limited to Islamic accounts (swap-free)and does not apply to regular accounts. |
In addition, XM 47.4,Exness Part C 2.5,FXGT 2.6 all share a common blanket clause. This clause invalidates " and trading patterns that involve no intention to trade in the market and only seek to gain financial profit without taking market risk, " and applies regardless of what the method is called. The very fact that the term "cashback arbitrage" is specifically included in the terms and conditions indicates that the brokers are aware of this practice and explicitly prohibit it
It is excluded from the calculation of commissions in the first place (XM's IB regulations)
This is more practically serious than the prohibition clause. Article 3 of XM's "Introducer Agreement"lists which trades will not be included in the calculation of IB commissions. Among them is a clause that specifically targets and eliminates the practice of earning commissions by using hedging.
- Section 3(c)— "Transactions settled using the "close by" and "multiple close by" functions will not be included in the calculation of referral rewards." Close bya dedicated function in MT4 that closes hedged positions by offsetting them against each other. This clause excludes transactions where hedged positions are closed using close by from the calculation of rewards.
- Section 3(b)— "Transactions held for 5 minutes or less will not be included in the calculation of referral rewards." Short-term trading, such as opening and closing hedged positions, is also excluded.
- Section 3(d)— "No rewards will be paid for the act of executing trades through an account solely for the purpose of generating rewards (churning)."
- Article 9- "Rewards (self-rebates) generated from the affiliate's own trading account, or from a trading account deemed to be managed or controlled by the affiliate, will not be considered." Measures include non-payment of rewards, suspension of the affiliate's account, and termination of the business relationship.
In other words, at XM, even before it is detected as a violation of the terms and conditions, the trade will not be counted as a commission in the first place . Other companies also have similar clauses.Exness's Partner Terms and Conditions 5.7 stipulate that if there is reasonable grounds to suspect "auto-referral" (receiving commissions from trades in accounts that a partner is directly or circumstantially controlled by evidence, including but not limited to cases where the partner and the referred customer use two or more identical IP addresses ), the partner's commission will be reduced to 0%.FXGTstates in 21.5.1 that "trades opened and closed solely to receive partner commissions (churning)" and in 21.5.5 that "holding multiple accounts using multiple email addresses for the purpose of receiving commissions" are grounds for non-payment of commissions and immediate closure of accounts, respectively.
There is nothing wrong with "receiving cashback" itself
To avoid confusion, let me clarify the distinction. The two prohibited actions are: (1) repeatedly engaging in trading that does not involve market risk solely for the purpose of obtaining cashback or IB commissions, and (2) receiving commissions by referring your own account (self-IB)
In contrast, opening an account through a third-party cashback site and receiving cashback on trades made based on your own market views is a completely different matter. There is no problem under the terms and conditions with lot sizes accumulating as a result of normal discretionary trading, including hedging. The boundary is not whether or not you used hedging, but whether or not you had the intention to take market risk . The cashback mechanism itself is explained in " What is Cashback in Overseas Forex?"
If it is determined that you fall under this category, the consequences will not be limited to just the cessation of cashback. The terms and conditions stipulate a series of measuresIS6FX's "commission freezing" is exactly this. , including the invalidation of the transaction itself, the forfeiture of profits, the cancellation of the IB commission that was the source of those profits, and the freezing of your account .
What happens when a violation is determined?
The specific measures to be taken are written in the regulations. Thinking that it will only result in a warning will be a misunderstanding of the reality
| Contractor | Measures stipulated in the terms and conditions |
|---|---|
| XM(47.4) | Invalidation of all transactions and profits/losses / Temporary or permanent closure/suspension of all accounts / Cancellation of all transactions / Prohibition of opening new accounts / Invalidation of profits and refund of only the principal deposit (deducting deposit and withdrawal fees). Section 47.3 also stipulates the recovery of past trading profits. |
| Exness(Part C 2.5) | Closure, suspension, and blocking of all accounts / Cancellation of all transactions / Disabling of internal transfers / Disabling of automated withdrawal processing / Reduction of leverage / Disabling of EAs and expiration of API keys / Disabling of profits / Raising of margin requirements / Imposition of daily management fees on open positions. Part C 2.4 also explicitly states the possibility of refusing withdrawals. |
| FXGT(8.6・8.8) | Immediate forfeiture of bonus / Exclusion from all future bonus programs /Blocking of all related accounts/ Invalidation of profitable trades / Refund of remaining balance only |
| HFM(27.1) | Account closure / Indefinite account suspension / Indefinite investigation / Demand for a penalty fee equal to or greater than the amount obtained through the method / Forfeiture of profits. It is explicitly stated that any profits already withdrawn will be recovered from the relevant account. |
| ThreeTrader(9.7) | Transactions unfavorable to the customer will be executed, while transactions favorable to the customerinvalid from the outset(unless the customer provides conclusive counter-evidence within 30 days) / Funds will be withheld / Accounts will be closed |
| BigBoss | All relevant transactions will be invalidated / only the principal amount deposited (after deducting any amounts already withdrawn) will be refunded /the account will be deleted. Deleted accounts cannot be recovered permanently/ any recreated accounts will be invalidated upon discovery. |
| IS6FX(Article 12) | Unconditional suspension or deletion of use /Freezing of rewards/ Legal action may be taken / Account blocking or termination.In such cases, it is explicitly stated that there is no obligation to refund funds in the account. |
| Axi(6.2) | Cancellation of unexecuted orders / Immediate forced liquidation of positions (without notification) / Suspension and closure of accounts / Cancellation and reversal of executed trades |
What's particularly concerning is that some brokers state they will return the principal deposit, while others do not . XM andBigBossclearly state they will return the principal, butIS6FXstates it has no obligation to refund, andHFMstipulates that it will even reclaim any withdrawn profits from related accounts. The situations in which these measures are actually implemented and the subsequent actions taken are covered in detail in the sections on overseas forex account freezing and overseas forex withdrawal refusal
As can be seen from the wording of the clauses, these measures are structured in a wayFXGT 8.6 lists "requesting the withdrawal of funds" as an example of the actions in question, andExness Part C 2.4 explicitly states "refusing to allow a customer to withdraw funds from their account" as one of the measures taken. The fact that nothing happened during trading does not prove that there are no problems under the terms and conditions. that makes them easily apparent during withdrawals .
Is there a way to avoid getting caught using hedging strategies?
This is one of the most searched questions in this article. To get straight to the point,within the same company, it's not even a matter of "getting caught/not getting caught."And even between different companies, the correct way to frame the question is not "will it be detected," but rather "what the terms and conditions prohibit and who makes the determination."
Within the same company, it's immediately obvious by looking at the transaction history
All MT4 and MT5 orders are routed through the broker's server, and the account number, instrument, lot size, direction, and execution time are recorded exactly as they are. If you hold both buy and sell positions for the same instrument in the same account, they will appear directly in the position list. Even if you use separate accounts, accounts under the same customer profile are completely linked from the broker's perspective.There is structurally no way to hide this information.
Furthermore, many brokers allow hedging within the same account.there's no need to hide anything within the same account. The problem arises when trading across accounts, and each company's detection criteria are outlined in their terms and conditions.
The conditions for detecting multiple accounts are written in the terms and conditions
The idea of "changing the IP address" or "using a different device" might come to mind, but those are not the only criteria listed in the terms and conditions for making a determination
| Contractor | Criteria for judgment as written in the terms and conditions |
|---|---|
| Exness(Part C 2.5) | Operation from the same location / Same IP address, ID, or phone number /Same deposit/withdrawal pattern/Similar or identical transaction pattern/ Sharing of the same device |
| ThreeTrader(Definition in 9.7) | One trader trading from multiple accounts simultaneously / using the same electronic identification information / deposit and withdrawal patterns /interacting with other account holders |
| BigBoss | Transactions from multiple accounts originating from the same or similar IP address (treated as nominee use) |
| IS6FX(Article 13) | If the same or similar network (IP address) or device is being used under a different name /if it is determined that the same entity is operating multiple accounts. |
What's noteworthy is"similar trading patterns" and "matching deposit/withdrawal patterns"are included as criteria for determination. Hedging involves placing opposing orders of the same asset and lot size at almost the same time.This is one of the most noticeable trading patterns, and the characteristics of the order itself do not change even if the IP address or terminal is changed.
What about interactions between different companies? | It's not a matter of "detection mechanisms," but rather a matter of "rules and discretion."
I will be precise here.Based on the publicly available information I investigated, I could not find any mechanism for companies to mutually share customer transaction history.None of the companies' terms and conditions mention such a mechanism. Some articles claim this makes it safe, but they overlook the following three points.
- The fact that it violates the terms of service remains unchanged.IS6FXspecifically prohibits "depositing money into two or more brokers and engaging in hedging transactions,"FXGT"external hedging with a third party," andThreeTraderdefines "external hedging" as a prohibited act in its terms of service for price manipulation. Whether or not it is detected and whether or not it violates the terms of service are separate issues.
- No "evidence" is required for the ruling —XM 47.4 states that it is triggered "at any indication or suspicion at XMTRADING's sole discretion ," andThreeTrader 9.7 states that it is triggered "BigBosseven officially states that "the determination of such conduct will be based on the overall judgment of our monitoring team, and if we believe ." may differ from the customer's intentions, but we may take action as soon as suspicion arises. "
- The right to receive an explanation may be denied by the terms and conditions.ArticleIS6FX12 ofThe judgment about the presence or absence of prohibited acts isdone in our company. It is assumed that it does not require any explanation of the content and rationale to the user." This means that there is no means in the terms and conditions to disclose why a violation was determined.
FurthermoreThreeTradera clause that invalidates any trade favorable to the customer from the outset, stating that " , includes unless the customer provides conclusive evidence that they did not violate the rules within 30 days of notification ." This design places the burden of proof on the customer . If one broker raises concerns about hedging between different brokers, it becomes the customer's responsibility to prove that they did not engage in such hedging.
Change the way you frame the question
Gathering information in a way that avoids detectionthe most costly way to fail. Nothing happens while things are going well, but once funds have accumulated, you request a withdrawal, and at that point, the entire amount becomes invalid. Moreover, the decision is at the discretion of the broker, and some brokers have no way of requesting an explanation in their terms and conditions.
From a practical standpoint, the following order of verification is necessary:
- Check the terms of service of the broker you are using to see how hedging and long-term trading are described(the list of brokerswill be your starting point).
- Check whether what you're trying to do is designed to "generate profits without taking market risk." If it is, then the relevant clause applies, regardless of its name.
- If you are unsure, contact the broker's support. Save their response along with the date. Some brokers, such as XM, TitanFX,AXIORY,IS6FX, andAxi, clearly state whether or not it is permitted in their official help or FAQ sections.
The difference between hedging in domestic and overseas FX | Is it true that it's "prohibited by the Financial Services Agency's regulations"?
I often see the explanation in articles about hedging that "domestic FX trading is restricted by regulations from the Financial Services Agency, so you should use overseas FX."This is inaccurate.What is prohibited is the solicitation of hedging by brokers, not the act of hedging by customers themselves. Let's check the relevant regulations.
The law prohibits "solicitation," and the recipient is a business
The relevant legal provisionArticle 117, Paragraph 1, Item 26 of the Cabinet Office Ordinance concerning Financial Instruments Business, etc. (Financial Instruments Business, etc. Ordinance). The original text is taken from the current version of the e-Gov Laws and Regulations Search (amended by Cabinet Office Ordinance No. 66 of 2026, effective August 3, 2026) (confirmed September 9, 2026).
With regard to over-the-counter derivative transactions or the acceptance of such transactions (limited to transactions involving the deposit of margin or other guarantees), soliciting customers (omitted) to engage in transactions equivalent to the sale or purchase of such over-the-counter derivative transactions or other similar transactions conducted by the customer (meaning transactions that reduce the losses that may arise from these transactions),or engaging in other similar acts.
There are three points you should read
- The prohibited acts are "solicitation and other similar acts"—not "conducting transactions" or "receiving orders." Article 117, Paragraph 1, Item 36 explicitly prohibits "acts of accepting orders, etc." for commodity futures, clearly distinguishing between the two. Item 26, which applies to FX, only covers solicitation.
- The addressee is the business operator—the introductory clause of Article 38 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, which this ministerial ordinance fills in, stipulates that "Financial instruments business operators, etc., or their officers or employees shall not engage in the following acts." Customers are not included as addressees.
- The term "double-trading" doesn't even exist in the law—a full search of the current Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments Business yields zero results for "double-trading." The legal expression is "matching transactions," and "double-trading" is an industry jargon.
The Financial Services Agency's supervisory guidelines state that there is nothing wrong with answering "yes" in itself
A more direct description can be found in the Financial Services Agency's "Comprehensive Supervisory Guidelines for Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc." (August 2026 edition), IV-3-3-2 (4) ② (confirmed September 9, 2026)
When a customer expresses a positive intention to engage in hedging transactions, or when a customer inquires whether or not they can engage in hedging transactions,informing them that they can engage in hedging transactions does not immediately fall under Article 117, Paragraph 1, Item 26 of the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments andExchange Transactions. However, making the above-mentioned statement or representation without mentioning that hedging transactions "may lack economic rationality because they involve disadvantages such as double commission charges, the risk of negative spreads due to interest rate differential adjustments between currencies (hereinafter referred to as "swap points"), and the customer bearing double the price difference between the buying and selling prices based on the mid-rate (the so-called "spread received by over-the-counter financial futures traders")" falls under "other similar acts" as defined in Article 117, Paragraph 1, Item 26 of the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments and Exchange Transactions.
In other words, the Financial Services Agencyclearly stated that if a customer says they want to engage in hedging, the broker is allowed to say "yes." What is prohibited is simply writing or displaying "hedging is possible" without mentioning the disadvantages.The regulation concerns how brokers explain the service, not the customer's trading.
In addition, we conducted a full-text search of the self-regulatory rules and guidelines of the Financial Futures Association of Japan (52 documents were obtained from their official website, and text could be extracted from 51 of them) and the investment solicitation rules of the Japan Securities Dealers Association, but wecould not find any provisions prohibiting or restricting hedging(0 results for "hedging" - confirmed September 9, 2026).
After examining eight major domestic companies, I found that all of them allowed hedging (two-sided trading)
After reviewing the relevant laws and supervisory guidelines, I checked the official websites to see how domestic companies are actually operating (confirmed on September 9, 2026)
| Contractor | Whether or not hedging is permissible | Required margin when hedging |
|---|---|---|
| GMO Click Securities FX Neo | Possible | MAX method (offsetting) |
| DMM FX | Possible | Required for both buying and selling (no offsetting) |
| SBI FX Trade | Possible | MAX method (offsetting) |
| Rakuten FX | Yes (※Not available for AS streaming orders) | MAX method (from September 26, 2022) |
| Gaitame.com | Available (※Default setting is "None"/ Not available when ordering with one-click ordering) | MAX method |
| Hirose Trading LION FX | Available (*Default setting is "No hedging". Only available in the HTML5 version) | MAX method |
| Minna no FX | Yes (Turn on hedging setting) | MAX method |
| Monex Securities FX PLUS | Possible | MAX method (from March 17, 2012) |
All eight companies I investigated allowed hedging, and not a single one prohibited it.Regarding margin requirements, seven out of eight companies used the MAX method (a method that calculates only the larger of the buy and sell orders), and only DMM FX required margin on both sides. The explanation that "hedging in Japan incurs double margin requirements" is also inaccurate.
On the other hand, all eight companies explicitly state that they "do not recommend" this practice. This is not a matter of individual company preference, but rathera response to what regulatory guidelines require of brokers. GMO Click Securities' trading rules are a typical example of this wording.
[Trading Rule "18. Hedging"] Hedging is not recommended by our company because it lacks economic rationality, as it can result in a negative spread due to swap points, and customers may incur double costs due to the spread when making an offsetting trade, or trading costs may be doubled depending on the settlement method. Please trade at your own discretion and responsibility. [Same "6. Margin / 2. Required Margin"] However, the calculation method for required margin when hedging the same currency pair will be the MAX method
The guidelines require a specific format: list the disadvantages, state that it is "not recommended," but then allow the transaction itself and offset the margin.This is precisely the form the supervisory guidelines demand. Gaitame.com and Hirose Tusho have turned off the initial setting for hedging for the same reason, with Gaitame.com explaining that "the system is designed so that customers can perform hedging transactions by changing the settings at their own discretion after fully understanding the above characteristics."
It is sometimes written that "hedging is prohibited on Rakuten FX," but this is a misinterpretation. The only mention of "hedging" in Rakuten FX's trading rules isin one sentence that applies only to AS Streaming Orders (an order method in which the system automatically determines whether it is a new order or a settlement order), and hedging is possible with regular orders. In fact, Rakuten Securities has introduced the MAX method, stating that "regarding the margin required when hedging (omitted)... this will enable customers to trade with greater capital efficiency."
So, what are the differences between domestic and overseas markets?
Since there is no law prohibiting customers from hedging, the difference between domestic and overseas marketsthe "presence or absence of regulations" but in the "design of the brokers." To summarize, it is as follows:
| item | Domestic FX | Overseas FX |
|---|---|---|
| Whether or not hedging is permissible | There is no legal prohibition.It is possible at all eight major companies surveyed. | There are no legal prohibitions.None of the 10 major companies surveyed prohibit hedging within the same MT4/MT5 account. |
| Can the company solicit customers? | It is not possible. Displaying "hedging is possible" without mentioning the disadvantages falls under Article 117, Paragraph 1, Item 26 of the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments Business, etc. | Because it is not registered with the Japanese Financial Services Agency, it is not subject to these regulations |
| Margin when hedging | out of eightcompanies used the MAX method for offsetting. DMM FX is the only one that requires both sides. | There are brokers with 0% share, brokers with 50% share, brokers that divide by stock, and brokers that divide by platform (see list in the main text). |
| Leverage | Individuals can get up to 25 times | Each vendor has their own settings (hundreds of times or more) |
| Margin call | Yes. If the hedging strategy fails and the balance becomes negative, an obligation to deposit the shortfall arises | Many brokers employ a zero-cut system, meaning that within the terms and conditions, the transaction will stop at the deposit amount |
| Transaction invalidation / Account freezing | There are regulations for financial instrument business operators and a framework for dispute resolution (designated ADR) | According to the terms and conditions, the broker has the discretion to invalidate transactions, forfeit profits, and freeze accounts(see the specific terms and conditions of each company in the main text). |
Therefore, the justification "I can't do hedging in Japan due to regulations, so I'll go overseas" is not valid. The actual differences lie in leverage, whether or not margin calls are made, and the magnitude of the risk if a violation of the terms and conditions is deemed to have occurred . And another real difference is not "within the same account" but "between multiple accounts and multiple brokers ." For the eight domestic companies, we only checked the treatment within the same account and did not investigate the regulations for multiple accounts . On the other hand, eight out of ten overseas companies explicitly mention multiple accounts. The overall differences in regulations between domestic and overseas are compared in detail in the article " Differences between Overseas FX and Domestic FX ."
Regarding "hedging across domestic and overseas markets," even if there are no issues with domestic laws, it may violate the terms and conditions of the overseas broker . How different brokers handle hedging between different brokers varies, so be sure to check the section on hedging between different brokers
When to use hedging and when not to use it
Based on what we've discussed so far, let's put it into practice. Since hedgingis not a tool to stop losses but a tool to buy time, it only makes sense when you have a plan for what you will do with the time you've bought.
When to use it: When there is a set deadline and conditions for cancellation
| scene | Things to do | How to determine the conditions for deactivation |
|---|---|---|
| Crossing the gap between the release of economic indicators and statements by key figures | Take the opposite position of the same lot just before the announcement, and then close one of them once the results are in and the direction is determined | The decision will be made by time. The restriction will be lifted ◯ minutes after the announcement, once the price movement has stabilized. |
| Temporarily protect long-term swap targeting | The strategy involves holding long-term positions to aim for positive swap points, and then selling only during downturns | The decision will be based on price. The sell position will be closed once the price returns to the expected support level. The cost of a negative total swap will be factored in. |
| Diversify the timing of payments | Applying an opposing position to only a portion of a profitable position, while letting the rest run (partial hedging) | Decide by lot. Before construction begins, decide how much to fix and how much to extend. |
| Makes carrying over tasks that span weekends or holidays easier | If you want to avoid the risk of a gap opening but don't want to close the position, you can hedge before the market closes | The duration is determined by the time period. The restriction will be lifted after the market opens at the start of the following week. However, some brokers prohibit trading (including hedging) that exploits market closure times in their terms and conditions (FXGT 8.8). |
What they all have in commonthe conditions for canceling the position are decided before it is opened. It could be time, price, or lot size, but opening a hedged position without deciding on these conditions only results in incurring costs while postponing a decision. Regarding holding positions over the weekend,our article on overseas forex trading on Saturdays and Sundays, including actual data on gap openings.
Situations where it's better not to use it | The most common misuse is "as a substitute for cutting losses."
- To avoid cutting losses, you temporarily set up a hedged position—but since there are no conditions for canceling it, it remains stuck in that position. The only difference between this and cutting losses is whether the loss is realized or whether you postpone realizing it while continuing to pay costs, andthe latter ultimately results in a larger loss.
- Hedging when you don't have enough margin—with brokers and platforms where margin isn't offset when you have both open and closed positions, your maintenance margin will be halved the moment you hedge.AXIORY's cTrader, where simply changing the tool can triple the required margin, even with the same broker.
- Holding onto stocks with large negative swaps forextended periods is risky. When you have a hedged position, swaps are incurred on both sides, and the total cost tends to be negative. The longer you leave it open, the more your effective margin is depleted, and eventually, a stop-loss will be triggered, breaking down your hedged position.
- Combining this with dollar-cost averaging to try and recover losses—a strategy of temporarily stopping with hedging and then adding dollar-cost averaging in the same direction—actually works to increase the profit or loss that was supposed to be fixed.Hedging is a means of creating time to close out increased positions, not a means of increasing positions in the first place.
- Setting up accounts across multiple brokers—as seen in the main text, 8 out of 10 companies mention this in their terms and conditions or official help pages, with 4 mentioning it across different brokers. Thisis not done for the sake of capital efficiency, but rather to take on the risk of violating the terms and conditions.
Alternatives to consider when hedging
In many situations where you might feel like using a hedging strategy, there are actually cheaper alternatives
| Things I want to do | Double down | Alternative means |
|---|---|---|
| I want to stop further losses | You continue to pay the spread twice plus swap fees on both sides. The loss is not realized, but it doesn't decrease either | Cut your losses. The loss is confirmed, but the costs stop there. |
| I want to cut the risk in half | In brokers where margin is not offset, the maintenance ratio is actually halved | By partially closing a position, the lot size is halved. Both the margin and the profit/loss are halved simultaneously. |
| I just want to avoid any sudden changes in the event schedule | Hedge with the opposite position | position will be closed once, and then rebuilt after the announcement. The additional cost will be the same as the spread for one new position, and no issues will arise under the terms and conditions. |
| We want to grow while securing profits | Partial hedging and fixing a portion | Move your stop-loss order to the entry price or the level of your unrealized profit. No additional swap or margin will be incurred. |
If there's any reason to choose hedging,to "buy time while maintaining the entry price." Closing and reopening a position changes the entry price, so hedging is only worthwhile in situations where it makes sense.
Frequently Asked Questions about Hedging in Overseas Forex Trading
Is hedging (holding both long and short positions) prohibited in overseas forex trading?
None of the 10 major brokers we investigated prohibited hedging within the same account on MT4 or MT5. XM, TitanFX,AXIORY, andIS6FXofficially state that hedging is permitted, andAxialso states in its official help section that it allows both partial and full hedging on MT4.ExnessandFXGT.HFM,ThreeTrader, orBigBosswe could not find any official statements forAxi's proprietary platform ATP officially states that hedging is "not permitted"). The prohibited actions listed in each company's terms of service are those aimed at profiting without taking market risk, such as hedging across multiple accounts, hedging with other companies, and hedging for the purpose of abusing zero-cut or bonuses even specify how margin is calculated when hedging in the main text of their terms of service ( , and only For more details, please see the list for each broker
Is hedging a surefire winning strategy? Is it profitable?
This is not a guaranteed winning strategy. With hedging, only the profit or loss from price movements can be fixed; the spread is fixed twice the moment the position is opened, and swaps continue to accrue on both the buy and sell sides. When we compiled the official swap values of eight companies,the total for buy and sellwas negative in all 23 data points (the median for USD/JPY was -approx. $10.56 per lot per day).The longer you leave it open, the more costs accumulate. The Financial Services Agency's supervisory guidelines also classify hedging as a "transaction that may lack economic rationality" due to reasons such as "double fees being incurred," "the risk of negative spreads due to swap points," and "double burden of spreads."
Will hedging between different brokers be detected?
We could not find any publicly available information indicating that brokers share customer transaction history with each other. However, this does not mean that it is "not a problem."IS6FXprohibits "depositing money into two or more brokers and engaging in hedging transactions" in Article 12 of its Terms of Service,FXGTprohibits "external hedging with third parties" in Article 8.6, andThreeTraderprohibits "external hedging" in Article 9.7. In addition, each company states that "suspicion is sufficient" or "if we believe it" as conditions for initiating action, andBigBossofficially states that "there may be discrepancies with the customer's intentions, but we may take action as soon as suspicion arises."Judge based on how it is handled in the terms and conditions, not on whether detection is possible or not.
Is it possible to hold both long and short positions (hedging) at Exness?
Hedging is permitted.Exness's terms of service formally define "Hedged Positions" (buy and sell positions of the same quantity and security opened in the same trading account), and Part D specifies how margin is calculated when hedging. It also states that even when a margin call notice is issued, you may open a "hedged position to reduce margin" if approved by the company. On the other hand, Part C 2.5 lists the operation of multiple accounts, "risk-free profits," and "malicious hedging" as prohibited trading methods. Whilenormal hedging within the same account is directly anticipated by the terms of service, the idea is that designs to gain profits without taking risk fall under the prohibited category.
What happens to the cashback if I use a hedging strategy?
There is nothing wrong with opening an account through a third-party cashback site and receiving cashback on trades made based on your own market view. The problem arises when yourepeatedly make trades that do not take on the risk of price fluctuations, solely for the purpose of obtaining cashback or IB commissions. XM's Terms of Service 47.4 defines "cash-back arbitrage,"Exness 's Part C 2.5 defines "cash-back/bonus arbitrage" and "trading solely for the purpose of generating third-party commissions,"FXGT's 2.6 defines "cashback arbitrage," andAxi's 6.2(h) defines "orders intended to generate rebates in a manner that deviates from the terms and purpose of the rebate agreement." Furthermore, Article 3 of XM's Introducer Agreement excludes "trading settled by close by and multiple close by" and "trading with a holding time of 5 minutes or less" from the calculation of commissions, so earning commissions using hedging is not counted at all. If it is determined that you have violated the terms and conditions, not only will the cashback be stopped, but the transaction may also be invalidated, profits forfeited, and your account may be frozen.
What happens to the required margin when using a hedging strategy?
This varies depending on the broker and trading platform. The official MetaTrader 5 help explains that for opposite-direction positions in the same instrument, "two margin calculation methods are possible, and the calculation method is determined by the broker." XM's official help states that the margin requirement for hedging FX, gold, and silver is 0%, and for other instruments it is 50%.FXGT's terms and conditions 14.11.1 clearly state that no margin is required for fully hedged accounts.AXIORY's official FAQ states that offsetting occurs in MT4/MT5 but not in cTrader . Since results can differ depending on the tool used, even with the same broker, it is necessary to check for each account
Can I use my bonus to hedge my positions?
The practice of using bonuses to hedge positions across multiple accounts in an attempt to generate profits without risk is explicitly prohibited by each company.IS6FX, in Article 13, prohibits "fraudulent trading across multiple accounts using bonuses" and "arbitrage trading using bonuses,"BigBossprohibits "high-risk trading that exploits loopholes in the bonuses and zero-cut system provided by the company," andFXGT, in Article 8.6, lists the abuse of bonus and incentive programs. Measures taken include immediate forfeiture of bonuses and exclusion from all future bonus programs. The treatment of each type of bonus is explained individually in the section on bonus hedging in overseas forex trading
Is it possible to use a hedging strategy that involves both domestic and overseas forex trading?
There are no provisions in domestic laws prohibiting customers from engaging in hedging. Article 117, Paragraph 1, Item 26 of the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments Business, etc., prohibits soliciting hedging by brokers, and the recipient is the financial instruments business operator. However, itmay conflict with the terms and conditions of overseas brokers.IS6FXexplicitly states that "the act of depositing money into two or more brokers and conducting hedging transactions" is prohibited,FXGTstates that "external hedging with a third party" is prohibited, and TitanFX states that "hedging transactions between different brokers, such as those aimed at zero-cut, are not subject to zero-cut." In addition, the tax system is different, with separate taxation in Japan and comprehensive taxation overseas, so profit and loss cannot be offset, and profit and loss planning may not go as expected (taxes on overseas FX).
Summary | The decision should be based on "what the objective is," not on whether hedging is permissible or not
After reviewing the terms of service and official help sections of the top 10 companies, down to the clause numbers, what became clear was"it's not the hedging strategy itself that's prohibited, but rather the design of a strategy that aims to profit without taking market risk." None of the 10 companies prohibited hedging within the same account on MT4 or MT5, while 8 companies specifically mentioned hedging across multiple accounts, and 4 companies (3 of which explicitly prohibited it) mentioned hedging across different brokers.
Key points of this article
- Hedging is not a guaranteed winning strategy, but rather a way to buy time. While it can fix the profit or loss from price movements, the spread (twice), swaps on both sides, and margin remain. Hedging without deciding on the conditions for closing the position before opening it is simply delaying a decision while paying costs.
- None of the 10 companies mentioned hedging within the same account on MT4/MT5. Eight companies mentioned hedging between multiple accounts, and four companies mentioned hedging between different brokers in their terms and conditions or official helpofficially state that hedging within the same account is "allowed," threeAxicompanies did not mention it, andAxi's proprietary platform ATP officially states that it is "not permitted"). The absence of a specific clause does not mean that it is not a problem if done.
- Hedging for the purpose of obtaining cashback and IB commissionsExness Part C 2.5, andFXGT is specifically referred to as "cash-back arbitrage" byAxi 6.2(h) andIS6FX is also captured as "commission-driven trading" byFurthermore, XM's referral agreement excludes "close-by trades" and "trades under 5 minutes" from commission calculations, making such trading impossible in the first place. This is treated completely differently from cashback earned as a result of discretionary trading.
- There is no way to avoid detection. The decision is at the discretion of the broker, and each company explicitly states that suspicion is sufficient, with some brokers even denying any obligation to explain. Measures taken include invalidating transactions, forfeiting profits, refusing withdrawals, and freezing all accounts.
- The statement that "hedging is restricted in Japan by regulations from the Financial Services Agency" is inaccurate. Article 117, Paragraph 1, Item 26 of the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments Business, etc., prohibits solicitation by brokers, not customer transactions. The Financial Services Agency's supervisory guidelines also clearly state that "informing someone that they can engage in hedging transactions does not immediately constitute a violation."
Ultimately, there's only one criterion for deciding whether or not to use it:"Is this hedging strategy meant to buy time by taking market risk, or is it meant to gain something without taking any risk?"If it's the latter, then it falls under any broker's terms and conditions, regardless of the name of the clause. If it's the former, then it will be treated as a normal transaction by most brokers.
If you're actually going to use hedging, there are three things you should check:① how the required margin for hedging is calculated in your account, ② whether you're using MT4, MT5, or cTrader, and ③ the total of the buy and sell swaps for the instruments you hold. Knowing these three things will allow you to calculate how much cost you're paying for hedging.
You can check the conditions for each broker on their respective pages. If you open an account through Moneycha, you will receive cashback based on the lot size generated from regular trading (eligible securities and cashback amounts vary by broker)
After checking the conditions for hedging, open an account via MoneyChat, where you can earn cashback









